Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Thursday, July 7
    Trending
    • ETH 2.0 Deposit Contract Hits 13 Million Ethereum
    • NFT Plazas Gives the Verdict on NFT.NYC – Was it Worth it?
    • Alex Ambrose refutes sexual misconduct charges; sends legal notice to the AIFF
    • Nicki Minaj’s Husband Sentenced to Probation – Billboard
    • BEAUTY AND THE BEAST Celebrating 30th Anniversary With 2-Hour Animated/Live-Action Special on ABC — GeekTyrant
    • How To Watch A Haunted House? Everything You Should Know
    • Chelsea reveal new Nike home kit for 2022/23 campaign
    • Top coach praises Rafael Nadal for improving his game as…
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Swave Digest
    • Home
    • World News
    • Technology
      • Smartphones
      • Computers
      • Programming
      • Automobiles
    • Entertainment
      • Music
      • Anime
      • Movies
    • Sports
      • Football
      • Basketball
      • Tennis
    • Business
      • Crypto
      • Stocks
      • NFT
    • Lifestyle
      • Fashion
      • Health
      • Travel
    • Shop
    Swave Digest
    Home»Sports»SEC football schedule: Inside the debate around its future
    Sports

    SEC football schedule: Inside the debate around its future

    Swave DigestBy Swave DigestMay 24, 2022No Comments11 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    SEC football schedule: Inside the debate around its future alabama lsu slade bolden
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    SEC football schedule: Inside the debate around its future 4415 829434SEC football schedule: Inside the debate around its future 4415

    Months ago, a consulting firm produced more than 30 different formats for a future football scheduling model of a 16-team Southeastern Conference.

    A week before the league’s leaders gather in Destin for their annual spring meetings, the 35 has been cut to two: an eight-game format where teams play one permanent opponent and seven rotating opponents (1–7 model); and a nine-game format where teams play three permanent opponents and six rotating (3–6).

    While most officials feel strongly that divisions are likely gone, and a pod system first floated out in the fall has been eliminated, the conference is virtually split on what to do next: eight conference games or nine? With this issue—and so many others—the SEC is divided mostly on revenue-generating lines.

    SEC conference logo

    Raymond Carlin III/USA TODAY Sports

    “It seems like a deadlock,” says one person familiar with the discussions.

    While the new, 16-team SEC is poised to potentially be the richest and most powerful in the history of college athletics, it is also one of the most diverse—a broad stretch of turf that features schools with differing financial situations, cultural views and varying interests. Like a microcosm of the NCAA itself, the SEC has haves and have-nots, both in historical athletic success and athletic budget.

    The league’s two new members coming in 2025, Texas and Oklahoma, have reshuffled the gridiron hierarchy deck a bit. But most within the conference would consider the top half Alabama, LSU, Auburn, Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Georgia and Florida. The bottom would be Tennessee, South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Mississippi State and Missouri.

    More than just about any other conference in the U.S., the league has a fairly clear delineation between those top eight and the bottom. After all, the Mississippi States and Vanderbilts are sometimes playing a different game than the Alabamas and Georgias. Many times, they do not agree on legislation, such as this one. What’s better for the top eight isn’t always best for the bottom eight. For instance, an eight-game model would allow every team in the league an additional fourth nonconference game to, some might say, pick up a needed victory—something the bottom teams need more than their big brothers.

    And what do their big brothers want? To make the league more valuable than it already is by increasing the number of inner-conference matchups. A property that is already incredibly valuable could be made more valuable.

    “We have to do what’s in the best interest of the league,” says one SEC administrator. That’s why the big boys might get their way. Most feel like at the end of this debate, the SEC will be playing a nine-game conference schedule in a 3–6 model. But the discussions aren’t over yet, and there hasn’t been an official vote taken. Those reading the room, though, say it’s split, maybe right down the middle: eight vs. eight. A majority is needed from the athletic directors to make a recommendation to the presidents, who normally approve such measures. However, Texas and Oklahoma are not yet voting members and won’t be until they officially join the league. The other 14, meanwhile, will be debating eight versus nine.

    So what are their talking points? Let’s get to the issues:

    Eight vs. nine

    In the conference’s current format, teams play eight conference games: six each year from within their own division and two opponents from the opposite division, one on a permanent basis and one rotating—a 6-1-1 model that has long been the target of criticism both in and outside the league.

    Why? Because it’s not equitable and doesn’t allow for more games against more teams within the conference. For instance, last year’s Alabama-Florida game in the Swamp was the first regular-season matchup between the two in 10 years.

    If there’s one concept everyone in the league has agreed on, it’s that they should play one another more often. Either of these formats, 1–7 or 3–6, allows for such. The rotation would mean that each team will host and travel to every league opponent in a four-year stretch.

    Aside from supplying an extra nonconference victory for those that need it, what good is the eight-game model over the nine-game format? For one, proponents say, it is an even number, and even numbers are easier to schedule. For example, under a nine-game model, an SEC team will play just four home games every other year.

    Imagine being the team that in Year 1 has a four-game home SEC schedule while your competitors have five. As one insider put it, “Those teams are going to be pissed.”

    Scroll to Continue

    The benefits of increasing to nine games are pretty obvious. The value of the conference rises. It means more butts in SEC stadium seats (and a more glamorous season-ticket package) at a time when college football attendance is declining nationally. It means more eyeballs on SEC games—bigger matchups more often. The 2020 COVID-19 season provided the blueprint for this. The league went to a conference-only 10-game schedule, and it was the most-watched season of SEC ball.

    It also would mean likely preserving secondary rivalry games. While a 1–7 model preserves the primary rivalries (think Mississippi State–Ole Miss, Auburn-Alabama, Texas-Oklahoma), a 3–6 model protects matchups like Alabama-Tennessee, Auburn-Georgia and, just maybe, Texas–Texas A&M.

    A nine-game league schedule also means not shelling out $500K to $1 million for the traditional nonconference “buy” game. However, a nine-game slate would not mean more immediate revenue from the SEC’s new TV deal with ESPN, those with knowledge of the contract say. Could the contract be renegotiated based on the increase in revenue? Maybe. After all, it would be eight more SEC games.

    A nine-game lineup has its issues, of course. Yes, you don’t get that easy extra win and you’ll have an uneven amount of league home games on alternate years, but the format also means that games already scheduled years from now might need changing. Several conference teams have scheduled two Power 5 opponents down the road. Imagine an SEC team playing 11 Power 5 opponents in a single year. It’s happened, but not often.

    Speaking of Power 5 games, it’s at the center of possible compromises within the room of 16 athletic directors. For instance, can the top eight convince the bottom eight to move to a nine-game schedule if the conference eliminates its requirement to play one nonconference game a year against a Power 5 opponent? Maybe.

    But what if it’s the other way around? What if the bottom eight could convince the top to move to an eight-game schedule if the league adds a second Power 5 nonconference game to the requirement? That might be more of a reach.

    Some administrators are more comfortable with a nine-game schedule if the College Football Playoff is expanded to 12 teams, which many expect to happen eventually. At that point, a three-loss SEC team would have a good shot of grabbing one of the six at-large berths. However, expansion talks last year failed, thus guaranteeing at least one year (2025) of a four-team playoff while under a new SEC scheduling format.

    Former Alabama WR Slade Bolden catches pass vs LSU

    Would LSU and Alabama still play yearly under a new model? It’s a key question.

    Butch Dill/USA TODAY Sports

    Permanent opponents and year-ending rivalries

    Already, there is compromise from one group to the other in regard to the three permanent opponents. In several versions of the permanent opponents floating around the league, it appears that the top eight teams would play two of their three permanent games against fellow top eight teams. They’d get two tops and one bottom. The bottom eight would get two bottoms and one from the top half.

    Is this purposely done? Maybe. Might it be a compromise to get the bottom half on board with a nine-game schedule? It sure feels that way. And honestly, it makes a ton of sense, and it’s something the league used in creating the 10-game league schedule during the COVID-19 season.

    Still, choosing a team’s permanent opponents will be a most tricky and unenviable endeavor that is sure to tick off virtually every fan base in the conference. Athletic directors and coaches have given their feedback on permanent opponents, but ultimately, conference officials will make the decisions. Good luck to SEC administrators Mark Womack, who is in charge of scheduling, and Charlie Hussey, who himself has been involved in this issue recently.

    Schedulers have plenty of problems to sift through. While a nine-game model would protect primary and secondary rivalries, it also eliminates pairing opportunities. Also, if there is indeed a requirement to give each top half team two of its own and each bottom two of its own, that’s another hurdle to leap in arranging schedules.

    It may create some odd situations, such as Florida having a permanent opponent that is 1,200 miles away (Oklahoma) or the yearly Texas A&M–Arkansas game going biennial. Also, how do you get rid of the SEC’s most-watched single matchup over the last decade—LSU vs. Alabama? Well, maybe you don’t.

    What about year-ending matchups? Those against ACC teams—South Carolina (Clemson), Florida (FSU) and Georgia (Georgia Tech)—are expected to remain as is. Most of the current year-ending SEC games may not change, either, such as the Egg Bowl, Iron Bowl, LSU–Texas A&M and Tennessee-Vanderbilt. But you might get some news ones, like Oklahoma-Missouri and Arkansas-Texas.

    And what of the Longhorns and the Aggies? How does the SEC welcome Texas into the league and not have it restart its annual rivalry series with A&M? It doesn’t make sense. They must play, multiple administrators tell Sports Illustrated.

    But everyone shouldn’t be so hung up on the permanent games, says one athletic administrator. “You’re going to play everyone every other year,” the official says.

    So let’s give this a shot, shall we? We guessed on permanent opponents while (1) considering the primary and secondary rivalries; (2) using geography; and (3) creating as much equity as possible (remember, top half teams get two from their own and one from the bottom half; bottom half teams get two from their own and one from the top half):

    • Missouri: Oklahoma; Arkansas; South Carolina
    • Arkansas: Missouri; Texas; Kentucky
    • Texas A&M: LSU; Texas; Mississippi State
    • Texas: Oklahoma; Texas A&M; Arkansas
    • Oklahoma: Texas; Missouri; Florida
    • LSU: Ole Miss; Texas A&M; Alabama
    • Ole Miss: Mississippi State; LSU; Vanderbilt
    • Mississippi State: Ole Miss; Kentucky; Texas A&M
    • Alabama: Auburn; Tennessee; LSU
    • Auburn: Alabama; Georgia; Vanderbilt
    • Vanderbilt: Tennessee; Ole Miss; Auburn
    • Tennessee: Vanderbilt; Alabama; South Carolina
    • Kentucky: Mississippi State; Arkansas; Georgia
    • Georgia: Auburn; Florida; Kentucky
    • Florida: Georgia; South Carolina; Oklahoma
    • South Carolina: Florida; Missouri; Tennessee

    Timing and the arrival of the new guys

    So when could all this be wrapped up?

    The scheduling issue is supposed to be a primary topic during league meetings in Destin, Fla., though the two newbies—Texas AD Chris Del Conte and Oklahoma AD Joe Castiglione—are not expected to be in attendance.

    Officials aren’t sure a decision will be made then or pushed until later this summer.

    Many within the conference feel like a decision needs to be made by the end of the calendar year, at the very latest. While Oklahoma and Texas aren’t due into the SEC until the 2025 season, there is always a chance that something could be worked out sooner.

    It seems highly unlikely that OU and Texas will strike a deal to leave the Big 12 next year. There’s no real rush anyhow. The SEC’s new TV deal doesn’t start until 2024, when it becomes possible for the Longhorns and Sooners to grab a prorated share of the conference’s new TV revenue. Maybe they find an avenue to enter a year earlier than normal? The Big 12 will have a new commissioner and will be working on a new TV deal itself. Anything is possible.

    Meanwhile, the current 14 SEC presidents, athletic directors and coaches are all expected to descend upon the Hilton Sandestin next week with plenty to keep them busy. Sure, there are transformation committee discussions (SEC commissioner Greg Sankey co-chairs that group). And yes, there will be plenty of talk about name, image and likeness (NIL) and the future of the NCAA.

    But the biggest single decision could be about, of all the things, schedules.

    Eight? Or nine?

    More College Football Coverage:

    • College Football Bad Blood Power Rankings
    • The Adding Meaning Behind Fisher’s Saban Comments
    • Winning Football Coaches Can Do As They Please

    around debate football future inside its schedule, sec sports the
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Swave Digest
    • Website
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest

    Related Posts

    NFT Plazas Gives the Verdict on NFT.NYC – Was it Worth it?

    July 7, 2022

    Alex Ambrose refutes sexual misconduct charges; sends legal notice to the AIFF

    July 7, 2022

    BEAUTY AND THE BEAST Celebrating 30th Anniversary With 2-Hour Animated/Live-Action Special on ABC — GeekTyrant

    July 7, 2022

    Chelsea reveal new Nike home kit for 2022/23 campaign

    July 7, 2022
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Contact Us
    © 2022 Swave Digest. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Posting....
    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by using the link Do not sell my personal information.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    Save & Accept